Antenna system for television



Oct. 23, 1951 D. J. LORUSSO ANTENNA SYSTEM FOR TELEVISION 2 SHEETS-SHEET 1 'Filed May 12, 1950 INVENTOR. genial J. Lorusso ATTORNEY Oct. 23, 1951 D. J. LoRusso 2,572,165

ANTENNA SYSTEM FOR TELEVISION Filed May 12, 1950 2 SHEETS-SHEET 2 Low maanzmcmms 2 6 FM 7 8 ll l2 COMPARATIVE RESPONSE IN DECIBELS V I00 IIO I70 I80 I90 ZOOZIO'ZZO FREQUENCY MEGACYCLES I INVENTOR DANIEL J. LORUSSO ATTORNEY Patented Oct. 23, 19 51 UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE 2,572,166 ANTENNA'SYSTEM FOIt TELEVISION Daniel J. Lorusso, Westboro, Mass.

' Application May '12, 1950, Serial No. 161,662

3 Claims. 1

The present invention relates to antenna systems and is particularly directed to 'an'improved antenna for the reception of signals of frequencies associated with television broadcasting. It is the primary object of the present invention to provide an antenna which is'designed for high gain unidirectionalperformance throughout all of the presently designated television channels.

When considering the general problem'o'f high gain performance, the efficiency of a conventional dipole antenna is well understood, as is its action at frequencies other than for which it is designed. Briefly, a simple dipole designed for one frequency will operate at reduced efliciency when operated at differing"frequencies. In the event of higher frequencies, the loss of effectiveness is due to flattening out of the radiation lobes so that although morewire or metal is being energized, the effective radiation of the antenna in any one direction is less. As a result, a fairly uniform response is achieved over a frequency range only wide enough 'to reasonably cover one television .channel with a width of six megacycles.

The conventional folded dipole antennais well known to have higher efiiciency over a wider range than the simple dipole noted above, as the folded dipole possesses a fairly uniform response across arange of frequencies'wide enough to reasonably cover four television channels, with a range of twenty-four 'megacycles. Such a folded dipole antenna, however, fails far short of offering a full solution to the problem, since it is incapable of operation over'the entire twelve television channels with a ranged from 54 to 216 megacycles. If a folded dipole is operated at frequencies beyond its range, it will result in flattening out the radiation lobes, so that the effective radiation in any one direction would be less.

The present invention provides a bat wingshaped dipole antenna 'of continuous conducting material forming a complete electrical circuit, with the front portion of the dipole concaved towards the front of the antenna, while two rear portions of the dipole are bent inward away from the front portion to obtain varied spacing between the front and rear portions, so that the flattening of the lobes is prevented, and so as to render the center impedance substantially constant. All the energy becomessubstantially additive and in phase, with the lobe sharpening effect remaining in line for a considerable frequency range. The antenna-is cut to acne-half wave length for a given channel in the lower frequency range; "forexample-channel 3 at :61-

mega'cycles, so that at higher frequencies it becomes continuously more effective than -a---ha l'f wave until, at the highest channel frequency to be received, it may function as a two full wave antenna with practically the same in-line pat- According-1y, volttern asat lower frequencies. age derived at such higher frequencies is more effective.

The frequency-'response-over the entire twelve television channels "is increased, when two bat wing-shaped "dipoles "of the above described type areu'sed in theform of anXyse more wire will-- be energized and more energy will-be transferred to the transmission line.

The above and other "advantageous featuresc'f the present invention will hereinafter more fully appear fromthe following'deseription"considered" in connection with the accompanying drawings,

in which, I r r Fig. 1 is a perspective view of my improved antenna system as it appears when looking :up--

wardly from beneath the supporting =mast.

Fig. 2 is a plan "view of the antenna systemshown in Fig. 1, on an enlarged scale.

"Fig. 3 is a perspective -view similar *to Fig. 1-,

and "illustrating 'a modification of the invention.-

Fig. 4is a c'hartillustrating the -frequency response in decibels across the entire range -oftwelve television channels-obtained by utilizing my improved antenna, as shown in Fig. .1.

Fig. "5 is 'a diagrammatic illustration of the field or lobe pattern obtained by my antenna :at widely difiering frequencies.

Referringfirst to Fig. 1,-t'he antenna array or system is shown as being mounted at the top of a mast I, which "providesa suitable fitting 2 for supporting a crossbar -'3 -ex tending at right.

As best shown in Fig. 2, the driven element of the 'antenn'asystem, as indicated by the ref erence character D, is composed of tubular conducting material in the form of a -batwing-' shaped dipole providing a complete electricalcircuit, with the "front portions l :connected at their ends toan insulating plate 5' mounted'on the bar 3. It -is tobe noted that the portions 4 are concave toward the front of the antenna, in the direction from which signals are received, so that the effects of flattening of the radiation lobes is prevented, as will later appear. The two rear portions 6 of the dipole D are bent away from the front portions 4 to obtain a varied spacing between the portions 4 and 6, which spacing has the effect of broadening the band width and of-obtaining a center impedancecharacteristic "that will match a conventional 300 ohm transmission line of which the lead-in wires 1 form a part.

The antenna system also consists of tubular metallic directors 8 mounted on the front end of the crossbar 3 by fittings 9, with the directors extending in'spaced parallel relation. The directors 8 are of substantially equal lengths, and,

megacycles, and the lowest frequency in chari nel No. 3, at 60 megacycles. As previously noted, the length of the reflector i9 is slightly greater than the length of the driven element D, so that the reflector I 0 will have a length of approximately 100 inches for the antenna system shown in Fig. 2.

The spacing between the parts of the antenna system along the cross bar -3 is also of some importance, and with the particular arrangement shown in Fig. 2, it has been found that best results are obtained with a spacing of 8 inches between the driven element D and the nearest dias shown, the directors 8 are cut to a one-half wave length for a givenchannel in the higher frequency range, for example channel 7 at 177 megacycles, and are approximately one-third the length of the dipole D, which as previously noted is cut for a one-half wave length at 61 megacycles. When directors are used at frequencies higher than channel '7, theywill be shorter making them somewhat less than one-third the length of dipole D.

The antenna system also includes a tubular metallic reflector l0 supported on the bar 3 by a fitting H, with the renector extending parallel to the directors 8, and facing the inclined legs 6 of the driven element D, which points in the direction of the reflector H). The length of the reflector I0 is slightly greater than. the over-all length of the driven element D, and the above noted general relation between the lengths of the parts of the antenna system is of very great importance in making it possible for the single driven element D, to pick up both high and low frequency broadcasts falling within the presently designated television channels.

As previously pointed out, the antenna shown in Fig. 2 is drawn to scale on the. basis of calculations which take into account the range of frequencies employed-for television, and frequency modulation broadcasting, as outlined above. In other words, there exists a very definite relation between the length of the driven element D, and the reflector M, as compared to.

the lengths of the directors B, and there will next be considered the basis on which these relative lengths are determined in order to obtain satisfactory reception from separate channels chosen from both the low and high frequency groups.

.For example, let it be assumed that for purposes of illustration, it is desired to have the antenna of Fig. 2 tuned to receive broadcasts from channel No. 3 having a frequency of from 60 to 66 megacycles, in the low frequency range, as well as from channel No. 7 having a frequency of from 174 to 180 megacycles, in the high frequency range. To meet this condition, the length of the directors 8 will be'made to substantially correspond with a one-half wave length for channel No. 7, at 177 megacycles, which is approximately 30 inches, while the length of the driven element D will be made to corerspond with a one-half wave length for channel No. 3, at 61 megacycles, which is approximately 90 inches. In other words, the ratio between the lengths of the driven element D and a director 8 is substantially 3 to 1, which ratio is substantially the ratio. that exists between the highest frequency in channel No. 7, at 180 rector 8, and a spacing of 18 inches between the driven element D and the reflector Ill. When two directors 8 are employed, they should be spaced apart a distance of 15 inches, which is substantially one-half the length of each director.

The specific frequencies given above for the relative lengths and spacing between the parts of the antenna system, shown in Fig. 2, are illustrative of the way in which the driven element D is laid out to obtain the best results for the reception of television broadcasts coming in from driven element of bat wing form.

As previously pointed out, all of the members entering into the antenna system shown in Figs. 1 and 2, lie in a horizontal plane, and it has been found that this particular arrangement is satisfactory to meet most of the conditions outlined above, with regard to receiving broadcasts for channels in both the high frequency and low frequency ranges. However, in order to increase the distance range and sensitivity of the antenna to frequencies at opposite ends of the entire television band, it has been found desirable in some cases to employ two driven elements in parallel. Such a modified arrangement, is shown in Fig. 3 wherein a pair of bat wing driven elements D-I and D-2 are mounted on the fitting 5 with their bases and legs bent in opposite directions with respect to the cross bar 3. In this modified arrangement, the driven elements D-l and D-2 are identical with the driven elements D of Fig. 1

I, to the extent of each being in the form of a bat wing, with the elements D-l and D-2 being addi-.

tionally bent so that the bases 4 and legs 6 thereof extend away from the cross bar in four diiferent directions, thereby increasing the amount of energy that will be transferred to the transmission line. It has been found that the modified antenna system of Fig. 3 will respond to an extremely wide range of frequencies when the two driven elements D-l and D-2 are connected in parallel, and coupled to a television receiving set by the lead-in wires 1 of the transmission line.

From the foregoing, it is apparent that by the present invention, there is provided an improved antenna array or system, characterized by the utilization of a bat wing driven element, so proportioned and disposed in such relation to a director and a reflector, that it will resonate at both the higher frequencies and the lower frequencies presently employed in television broadcasts. It has been found by actual tests that my improved antenna gives high gain unidirectional 5. performance over the entire range of frequencies as presently employed for television channels. Fig.4 graphically shows the frequency response obtained by my antenna, expressed in termsof decibel gain, across the entire low and high frequency range of television channels extending from 54 to 216 megacycles. In this chart, the vertical ordinates represent decibels plotted against the horizontal ordinates which represent the frequencies of the various television -channels. It is to be noted in Fig. 4 that the maximum response at 17'7 megacycles in channel F1 is the result of cutting thedirectorst to a :oneshalf wave length at this particular frequency.

' Fig.5 graphically shows the field or lobegpattern obtained by the use of my antenna at two widely different frequencies, such as are represented by channels 3 and 7, respectively. The dotted line pattern of Fig.5 illustrates the extreme sharpening of the lobes which results from cutting the directors 8 to match the frequency of 177 megacycles of channel 7, while the full line pattern shows the response of the antenna at the 61 megacycles of channel 3. It has also been found that the lobes of the full line pattern at frequencies that are not affected by the directors 8 can be sharpened by increasing the degree of concavity of the front portions 4 of the driven element. Therefore, it will be apparent from a consideration of Figs. 4 and 5, that my antenna is particularly adapted to give high gain performances that will be superior as compared to an antenna employing either a simple dipole or a folded dipole as a driven element, either of which elements are definitely limited in the number of television channels over which they will resonate. By utilizing my antenna the necessity of installing separate antennas for receiving signals at the higher and lower frequencies is eliminated.

In other words, my invention resides in providing a single bat wing shaped dipole that will function throughout all of the twelve television channels, without the need of using two separate folded dipoles, one longer dipole-for the low frequency channels, and one shorter dipole for the high frequency channels, which would require a phasing or connecting section, and possibly a quarter-wave matching section, to electrically connect both dipoles together. In my antenna, the center impedance of my dipole will match a conventional 300 ohm twin lead transmission line without the need of resortin to quarter-wave sections or other matching devices. The importance of this feature is readily apparent when it is remembered that conventional receivers, as now manufactured, are almost invariably matched to a 300 ohm line, and the use of any type of matching section between the line and the antenna necessarily causes the circuit to become frequency sensitive and thus nullifies any broad 'band characteristics that the antenna itself might possess.

Coming now to the performance of the directors, it is well known that parasitic directors at resonant frequency will absorb transmitted power and reradiate with such a phase relationship that the reradiated signal adds to the original transmitted signal. Then the dipole will be able to gather useful energy both from the original wave and from the reradiated wave which is sent out by the directors.

The conventional dipole, or folded dipole with parasitic directors all of approximate equal lengths, is commonly known as a Yagi antenna, and has a high gain at only a very narrow band awareci i requencies, with the resuit that a fairly :uni' form response is achieved wide. enough to restat ably cover one television channel with a maximum width of six ineg acycles.

If the yag i antenn'a i's' operat'ed at frequencies other th'an what it is designed for it would be In providing the antenna of the present in-' veriti'on, Ihave further improved the application of parasitic directors, by making the lengths of directors one-third or less than the length of the dipole. As a result, thedipole will have two-thirds or more exposed area that cannot be niillified by the directors when operated at free-- quencies other than the frequencies to which the directors are cut. The directors as used, are cut to half wave of any one selected channel of the high frequency channels, while the bat wingshaped dipole operates at one and one-half wave lengths at the lower end of the high frequency channels until, at the highest channel frequency to be received, it may function at two full wave lengths.

The directors will increase the efficiency considerably of any one selected channel of the seven high frequency television channels. It is understood that directors are used to increase the.

efiiciency of one channel only, for example if operated to receive high frequency channels 7, 10 and 13, and if channel 7 was weak, the directors would be out half wave to channel '7, or if channel 13 was weak instead of channel '7, then the directors would be cut to half wave to channel 13.

I claim:

1. An antenna for the reception of signals of frequencies associated with television broadcasting comprising a dipole element providing a continuous conductor bent to form two opposed V- shaped structures, each in a plane, one end of an arm of each V being connected to a corresponding terminal of a transmission line, and with the ends of the other arms of the Vs being conductively connected together, the arms connected to the transmission line being concave towards the other arms to prevent flattening of said elements lobe pattern, while the varied spacing between the arms of each structure serves to broaden the band width and to keep the characteristic center impedance of a 300 ohm transmission line, and with the length of said element corresponding to a one-half wave length of a frequency at the lower end of a channel range which is to be accommodated.

2. An antenna comprising a pair of dipole elements constructed in accordance with claim 1, in which the planes of the opposed Vs of each element are at an obtuse angle to each other to provide an X-shaped structure, with the ends of the concaved arms of the Vs being connected in parallel relation to corresponding terminals of the transmission line and with the ends of the other arms of the Vs being conductively connected together at a common point.

3. An antenna for the reception of signals of frequencies associated with television broadcasting comprising a dipole element providing a continuous conductor bent to form two opposed V- shaped structures, each in a plane, one end of an arm of each V being connected to a correspond- 7 terminal of a transmission line and with the ends of the other arms of the Vs being conductively connected together, with the varied spacing between the arms of each structure serving to broaden the bandwidth and to keep the characteristic center impedance of a 300 ohm transmission line, and with the length of said element corresponding to a one-half wave length of .a frequency at the lower end of a channel range which is to be accommodated, in combination with a straight director spaced from the arms of said Vs which are connected to the transmission line, with said director cut to a length which is not more than one third the over-all length of said dipole element, so that the said director improves the sensitivity of said element at said directors resonant frequency, while leaving at least two thirds of said element exposed that cannot be nullified by said director when said REFERENCES CITED The following references are of record in the me of this patent:

UNITED STATES PATENTS m Number Name Date 7 Re. 23,273 Kearse Sept. 26, 1950 1,745,342 Yagi Jan. 28, 1930 2,131,108 Lindenblad Sept. 27, 1938 2,175,253 Carter Oct. 10, 1939 2,199,050 Jenkins Apr. 30, 1940 15 2,452,073 Schivley et a1 Oct. 26, 1948 FOREIGN PATENTS Number Country Date 883,548 France Mar. 29. 1943 

